A little lesson in Content Packaging thanks to the Fab Four

Earlier today I was alerted to this video from Carlton Books giving what they term a "Sneaky Peek" at their upcoming book celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Beatles' first hit record.

As both a Beatles fan and scholar, I knew that this great looking book was destined to join my Fab Four research library (as I'm working on an idea for another Beatles related book proposal).

Then I started thinking about this video from a Publishing and Content Strategy perspective.

Anyone whose heard me speak on digital publishing will know I often repeat the phrase that "pixels and print are not mutually exclusive." In other words it isn't an either/or decision between digital and traditional print publishing, in most cases a book can exist equally in both and often help each other. - Which is definitely the case with my own Beatles book where Kindle sales have driven increases in print sales.

However there are some things that each medium does better than the other, and I strongly believe that print will flourish for publishers who figure out how and why print is special. In my view there is one advantage that print has over digital - reading a printed book is a tactile experience that engages the senses of feel and smell as well as sight.

A book like the one in the video above could not be done on a digital platform. Yes the written word and the photos could be reproduced, maybe even the video from the DVD and the sounds  included in a multi-media enhanced eBook - But the way it is packaged and presented is as a interactive tactile experience, and that's what will make it special. You can only do that in print.

The packaging of the book is also a great example of re-purposing existing content to be consumed and experienced new ways. Instead of a photograph of a concert poster or ticket, why not recreate them? Move interaction with the content from a passive one to an interactive one.

As well as the book itself and its refreshing content packaging, there is also the smart way that the content, and the idea of the book, is being promoted via the use of other media such as video and social networks.

Smart move Carlton Books - you've got my $$ already - and I just helped you spread awareness a little further.

A Tale of Two Cities (and Conferences)

It is the best of times, it is the worst of times*. Or at least that's the impression about the state of the content development industry that came across during two different publishing conferences I have attended in the last few weeks. Hosted in two cities that couldn't have been more diverse, Palm Springs, CA and Austin, TX, the conferences were opposite reflections of their locations.

Palm Springs CA can perhaps be summed up by the fact that the city's greatest attraction appears to be an aging vaudeville theater that boasts that it is home to the World's oldest chorus line! This, the city not the theater chorus line, was the venue for the 2012 Intelligent Content Conference (ICC12), a vibrant well programmed exchange of ideas that drew attendees from various aspects of the enterprise content development world, especially from service information, business process, and marketing; along with new technology practitioners, leading consultants, and content strategists. This group understood that the real value of the new publishing model was in the content itself (hence the title of the conference.)

The underlying feeling coming away from this conference was that the attendees thought that this was indeed the "best of times" to be in content development. The biggest revolution in content development and delivery since the invention of the printing press is opening up an incalculable number of opportunities to redefine both the business model, and the way we tell our stories and interact with those who consume them.

Austin, TX on the opening day of the annual SXSW Interactive conference gives off that same vibe of excitement and opportunity as leading thinkers, futurists, innovators, and entrepreneurs descend on the Texas capital to discuss the future of the web. Part of this year's opening day events included a one-day mini-conference based on O'Reilly's Tools of Change (TOC) annual publishing industry get together in New York. As expected the majority of attendees where from the worlds of traditional book and magazine publishing. The contrast between this crowd and the attendees at Intelligent Content, and the larger SXSW crowd, couldn't have been more marked. The underlying vibe that I picked up at the TOC day was one of confusion, and even panic.

The first speaker, mobile designer Josh Clark, provided one of the best summaries on how to approach the new publishing paradigm when he said that "Your product is called content, everything else is a container." He also went on to say that "Mobile isn't about Apps. An App isn't a strategy." Yet nearly every other speaker, and question from the audience, ignored this great advice. The focus of most conversations was firmly on the delivery process and medium, not about the thing actually being delivered, the content. And during the sessions I was at I never heard a single word about how to add value to the content by making it intelligent

My feeling was that most of the TOC audience this is "the worst of times," as things are changing too fast to understand, and the traditional business model no longer works.

And that's where I believe the disconnect between these two groups originates - with the business model.

In the corporate world the development of content is a key part of any business process (In fact in THE CONTENT POOL book I put forward that it is THE key component), and that while it may not always be recognized as such, it is generally developed irrespective of the delivery platform. Yes particular platforms may be specified, but they are more a matter of convenience and familiarity than an integral part of the company's overall business model. The value to the organization is implicitly in the content, not the delivery model.

In traditional publishing, no matter what lip service is paid to content, it is the delivery mechanism that provides the value. The business model of traditional publishing is built around the infrastructure and process to move pieces of paper from the printer, to the warehouse, to the retail outlet, and eventually into your hands as a consumer. It is only you, as a consumer, who then derives any value from what was on that paper - the content.

While the corporate world sees new delivery models as an opportunity to provide more and more intelligent content, traditional publishing sees it as a disruptive event to a centuries old infrastructure.

The best of times; the worst of times.

=======

* With apologies to Charles Dickens for the paraphrasing. - "A Tale of Two Cities" was originally published concurrently in two separate formats - In the weekly magazine All Year Round without illustrations , and in collected monthly installments with illustrations by regular Dickens artist Halbot Browne (from which the illustration at the top of this post is taken.) Dickens was a master of realizing the value of his content over format often publishing new works in various formats and platforms to reach the widest possible audience, before eventually publishing the full work as a novel.

If he were around today, I'm sure he would be one of the pioneers of digital publishing.

=============

The Force is strong in this Content.

I, like many of my friends, linked to, and shared, the video below today on our various Social Network accounts. I guess we did it for a few reasons:

1. It's funny.
2. The kid is cute.
3. It leverages a shared pop-culture reference that we all (well at least my friends) can immediately relate to.

But later in the day I started to think about this video in terms of content strategy and marketing.

Just before I wrote this post I checked some numbers on YouTube.

This video was posted on February, 2nd - just one day ago. It has already posted some impressive numbers:

• 2.3 Million views
• 605,000 posts on Facebook
• 29,600 links from Twitter
• 23,705 "likes"
• over 3,500 user comments.

Why?

Partly for the reasons I mentioned above. In short it's great content that people enjoy and want to share. And that's the key to a marketing message like this going viral - you need good content that the community is happy to recommend and share.

But also it plays across markets, and across language barriers. Of the 1 minute 2 seconds running time only, 8 seconds uses text that would need translating. There is no voice over to be translated or actors to be dubbed. It's all done through the power of images and music.

Using different media types in this way can be (if you will excuse the pun) an effective force for making your content connect with your audience.

The Return of the LP & what it may mean for Content Delivery.

I think it was generally agreed among my family that the coolest present I received this Christmas was the one my eldest daughter bought me. She ignored everything of my Amazon wish list, and instead proved that she did in fact listen to her father when he went off on one of his nostalgia trips about the music of his youth. She bought me a turntable. Yep one that actually could play the few remaining vinyl albums we had in the house (most of which now spend their days in frames on the living room wall.)

Once we had it set up and were spinning a few of the old records, I had a fairly lengthy discussion with her and her boy-friend about how a record and turntable worked, and just what was so special about the good old LP as opposed to a modern CD, or digital download. (Still seems a little funny to me that two 21 year-olds had never seen a record being played before.)



That conversation stayed with me over the holiday. Why had the LP had such a cultural impact? Records and record players had been around for decades before the sudden explosive growth of music ownership that started in the mid to late 1950s and early- 1960s. Sure the birth of rock-n-roll had a large part to play, but I thought there must be more to it than that. Then earlier this week I read the following passage by Jonathan Gould in "Can't Buy Me Love" his excellent social history of The Beatles.

"Ultimately the attribute that sealed the success of the LP in the popular market had little to do with its expanded capacity or its improved sound quality. Designated as 'packaged product' by the recording industry LPs were the first records to be sold in foot-square cardboard jackets faced with glossy cover art, which served as an alluring advertisement for the music within. This allowed them to be prominently displayed in racks or bins in virtually any kind of store; it also allowed them to be advertised as recognizable products in newspapers and magazines. (Singles in contrast, were still packaged in plain paper sleeves and sold mainly in specialist record stores.) The LP cover became a companion piece to the listening experience by providing photographs, biographical information and promotional copy."

As I've been working on my upcoming book, The Content Pool, I started to equate this great piece of social and economic history to the ideas of Content Delivery.

Think about the LP - it was still delivering the same sort of content as earlier record formats (78s and 45 singles), yes it was using new technology to deliver more in the same media, but it didn't find traction with its user base until the packaging and delivery channel was changed.

What made it work?

• When the content was placed in the same location that the users frequented anyway - they no longer had to go searching for it.


• It was clearly labelled and could be browsed - instead of having to read the fine print on a label, or be an expert.


• It was presented along with additional information that gave the content context.


• The new packaging was durable and could be accessed many times without degrading - inviting reuse.


• Social networks and peer recommendation developed around the ease of accessibility and navigation.

As we all struggle with ways to present our content in new formats and on new media, maybe we can learn a few lessons from the past.

Now you will have to excuse me, I have to go turn this copy of "The Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl" over.